暖冬爆款数据多维领跑
治愈烟火气收获高口碑
从官宣到非会员收官,《卿卿日常》一路收获了极高的热度和口碑。开播前,该剧在爱奇艺站内预约量高达216万,位列新片期待榜第一名。开播仅144小时,热度值破万,打破爱奇艺热度值破万历史最快纪录,累计破万天数达16天。截至收官,爱奇艺热度值最高达10477,共揽全网热搜3755个,微博热搜共计2082个,#山峥海薇拦腰吻戏# #尹峥李薇三连吻# #卿卿日常大结局全员HE#等剧情向话题,及#卿卿日常空镜有多美# #卿卿日常东方美学#等品质向话题登上榜单,获得网友好评;抖音热搜共计474个,#卿卿日常主话题播放量高达106.6亿次,登上剧集榜TOP1,制作、剧情、情感、玩梗等精品短视频花式出圈。此外,达成猫眼2022喜剧年冠、云合2022年度集均V7,集均V30年冠、灯塔2022热播期集均播放指数年冠的好成绩。德塔文电视剧景气指数最高达2.156,成为11月榜TOP1;酷云全端播放市占最高达26.86,共23天夺得TOP1。同时,Vlinkage、骨朵、艺恩、艾漫等多平台数据登顶。
口碑方面,该剧取得豆瓣开分7.6的好成绩,更获得人民日报、新华网、光明网、中国新闻网、北京日报等官方媒体相继点赞。其中,人民日报评价“在人人渴望‘慢节奏’的时代背景下,《卿卿日常》以修缮和打整家宅、家庭成员聚会吃饭这一系列最为日常的事情,抓住大众的审美心理和文化需求,打破古装剧同质化、类型化的藩篱。”从观众肯定的“电子榨菜”到“电子羽绒服”,清甜烟火气治愈人心,温暖冬日的《卿卿日常》掀起全民追剧热潮,热度、口碑全面开花。
回望大结局,尹峥与李薇许下承诺,相守一生;又逢中秋佳节,尹峥的生日终于在亲友团聚中度过,场面温馨。新川新一轮的女子“擢选”拉开帷幕,与以往不同的是,“选秀”革新成了“选贤”,追寻理想的女子们相聚新川。会员收官日发布的《经年》MV为故事画上完满句点,随着希林娜依·高的倾情演唱,各角色的成长与改变悉数重现。“往事不可追,来日却还长”,道破该剧期盼与观众并肩向前、收获成长的美好希冀。
“反套路”古装生活流新表达
再度实现轻喜题材成功探索
《卿卿日常》播出至今,热度与口碑一路“高开疯走”,观众与各角色在笑泪交织的旅途中一起成长。剧中不少名场面和金句台词成为破圈热梗,鲜活的青春群像与他们之间美好的亲情、友情、爱情,鼓舞着观众更加积极乐观地生活。尹峥与李薇的“先婚后爱”,是携手共进的双向奔赴;开府宴上,郝葭(陈小纭饰)的到来是为友情义无反顾的坚定;从“普信”到“悔悟”,三少主尹岸(刘冠麟饰)在“经历霜与雪的洗礼后”终于明白爱人爱己的意义;“人长了嘴,就要把误会说清楚;生了耳,就要听旁人辩白。不要因为矫情,又或者害怕面对而逃避问题,来回扯皮,浪费光阴。”正是元英(刘令姿饰)的台词,被观众评为“人间清醒”的金句……剧中的三餐四季、人间烟火备受喜爱,女性间的真挚互助与人共情,“《卿卿日常》没有宫斗宅斗,只有大家连在一起的心。”获得观众点赞。
该剧摈弃虐恋、争斗等古装剧套路模式,通过美食、社交、创业、耕田等富有趣味的生活琐事,诠释出“新川无大事,都是小日常”的创作态度,“慢节奏”的诗意生活画卷徐徐展开,与观众携手描绘出向往的生活。剧中,每个“小家庭”都有各自的烦恼与幸福,每个人都有自己的目标和期许,在相互鼓励、彼此帮助的集体氛围下,他们最终都迎来了“所愿所想,美美与共”的温馨结局。故事落幕,角色们欢聚一堂与九川的故事告别,观众随着他们的“经年”,体会人间至味是清欢、一蔬一饭即幸福的生活哲理。
《卿卿日常》是爆款《赘婿》主创新丽传媒旗下“狂欢者”团队的又一力作,在创作品质与耀眼成绩上皆有共性。以最轻松逗趣、最“反套路”的方式传递鼓舞观众的力量,从“小”处着手,一步步走出“大”格局,在贴近观众、满足观众的娱乐需求的同时,传递积极正向的价值观念,是该团队被观众津津乐道的独特优势,也是行业内正积极解构的“爆款密码”。
新丽传媒旗下“狂欢者”团队在该剧中诚意倾注的诸多正向价值、新颖表达,不负观众的期待与喜爱,也是在爆款《赘婿》之后,再一次与时代同频共振,在古装轻喜题材上实现了成功探索。
近两年,在“降本增效,提质减量”行业思想核心下,影视市场的整体进化略显谨慎,新丽传媒作为一家老牌影视公司,在成熟的工业化制作优势加持下,日益凸显出其融入互联网生态的格局理念与创作势能,甚至在不同赛道拿出了爆款佳作。无论是网络电影层面与《赘婿》IP的联动,还是在播出期间连续21天拿下云合数据电视剧有效播放榜第一,豆瓣评分8.3分的谍战剧《叛逆者》,都足以说明坚持精品路线、回归内容为王的核心策略,是新丽传媒近几年的爆款口碑标签,更是公司致力于打造感动人性、温暖人心,引起观众共鸣作品的核心坚守。
中新网评:处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******
中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称,将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对,企图将核污水“一倒了之”,把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。
资料图:日本福岛第一核电站。2011年,福岛核电站事故发生后,大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋,对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害,数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日,作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。
日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由,在2021年4月13日,正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多,日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。
日本政府辩称,这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全,甚至“可以喝”,这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。
事实上,经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质,核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收,长期来看,将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁,最终危害人类健康。
因此,核污水排海计划推出后,遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示,福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中,约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场,反对该计划。
日本政府认为,核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案,但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海,核污水会随着洋流流动,其影响势必会跨越国界,危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。
《韩国经济新闻》发文称,相关研究认为,福岛核污水如果排放入海,约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域,该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。
德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告,若日本将所有核污水排入海中,不到半年,整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁,包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。
日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国,有义务保护海洋环境。然而,在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上,日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。
国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估,但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论,并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下,日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设,这是极不负责任的行为。
太平洋不是日本的下水道,日本必须正视各方合理关切,在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后,制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远,若只顾眼前,执意将核污水排放入海,不仅其自身,周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单,其后果必将会危害数代人。
Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business
By John Lee
(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.
Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.
The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.
On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.
The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.
In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.
Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.
The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.
The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.
The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.
According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.
As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.
However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.
Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.
The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.
If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.
(文图:赵筱尘 巫邓炎) [责编:天天中] 阅读剩余全文() |